Sunday, September 23, 2012

A Plan for the Amalgamation of Greater Victoria


The problem faced by the residents of Greater Victoria is that we do not receive the benefit of good government (specifically, the best governance that should reasonably be made available to an area our size).  This becomes glaringly obvious when there are 13 municipalities and over 91 politicians governing approximately 360,000 people.

The reasonable solution is to amalgamate some or all of the municipalities into one, two or three cities.

Technical Solution

The only way to amalgamate the cities is for the Province of British Columbia to do so by legislation.  Each of the 13 municipalities exists only because the Province created them.

Historically the Province has only pursued an amalgamation, to the best to my knowledge, when a sufficient number of the residents in the area request it.

In 2003 I wrote to the Province of British Columbia and asked them to consider amalgamation in greater Victoria and the response from the Minister at the time (of the Liberal Government) was that they would only pursue amalgamation if requested to do so by the municipalities.

I then wrote to each municipality asking that they hold a referendum on the issue of amalgamation, in the next municipal election.  None of them did so.  Few even acknowledged receipt of the letter.

The reality of the municipal governments (except for the City of Victoria) actually asking for an amalgamation is realistically, nil.

Somehow we need to get the Province of British Columbia to actively pursue an amalgamation of some or all of the Greater Victoria Municipalities.

Practical Solution

Based on the fact that, for the foreseeable future the Province is not going to hold a referendum on the issue and the municipalities are not going to hold a referendum on the issue, we have to hold a referendum without the cooperation of the current governments.  It can be done.

Such a referendum can be held during the next municipal election in 2014.


We can hold a referendum by coordinating a group of people to market and run 13 candidates with a common, single-issue platform that has a clearly understood purpose, amalgamation.  Voters who support the issue can then give one of their multiple votes to the amalgamation candidate in their area.  The total votes will reflect the referendum.  The process to achieve this is set out here.

Create a Political Party

We need to first create a political party named “Amalgamation-Yes”.  The purpose of creating a political party is so that candidates, who are a member of the party, are able to have the words “Amalgamation-Yes” listed by their names on the ballot in the upcoming municipal election.

As a result, when the voter sees the ballet, they will clearly be able to identify the candidate who supports the issue.

“The Amalgamation-Yes Party represents citizens of Greater Victoria who support the amalgamation of the municipality in which they live with some or all of the municipalities in the greater Victoria Region.  We demand that the Province of British Columbia take steps to determine and implement the best organization of the 13 municipalities in the Greater Victoria Region to provide for less and better government.”

We do not want to push for a certain form of amalgamation; for example, there being only one city, three cities, or something else.  This is because that will split the issue.  Somebody might support amalgamation into three cities but not support amalgamation into one.  It is important that we acknowledge it is an amalgamation with one or more with the neighbouring municipalities.  The mandate will be then to seek to have the Province determine what the best solution for the region will be and then implement it.  We cannot get distracted on what the specific best scenario for the 13 municipalities is, at this time.

Common Platform

Candidates must run under the same platform in all municipalities.  The advertising, signage, and message must be the same. 

The very clear message must be:
“Please vote for our party only if you support the amalgamation of your municipality with one or more of your neighbouring municipalities.  Do not vote for the party if you do not support amalgamation, even if you would otherwise like to see the candidate in office.”

This is important, as we will take the results of the election and present them to the Provincial Government and seek to have the Province study and implement the best way to govern the area based on the results of this election.

By making the message clear, we will be creating a referendum.

The message to the public (and the Provincial Government) must be clear that:
If you support amalgamation we seek only one of your votes for the candidate who is a member of Amalgamation-Yes.  There will be other candidates you may support, but if you favour amalgamation please allocate one vote to an Amalgamation-Yes candidate.

Candidates would not run for Mayor.  We need to ensure that people are voting for the amalgamation issue and not simply for a candidate.  This is far more likely to occur when people are considering one of the many votes they have for counsellors, rather than the one vote they have for mayor.

By having party members run only for the position for councillor, we will generate a more accurate vote of those in favour of amalgamation.

All material published by candidates and the Amalgamation-Yes party will indicate that if sufficient candidates receive a high number of votes (which represent support of amalgamation) those results will be taken to the Provincial Government for action.  We will show to the Government that:

1.               The voters were asked to only vote for our candidates if they supported amalgamation or their municipality with one or more of their neighbours; and
2.               The results, if as anticipated, are significant, will reflect that there is overwhelming support for some municipal reorganization in the Greater Victoria area. 

By use of the party name, members of the public will be able to identify the candidate whether or not they remember the name of the individual in their municipality. 

Nominate Candidates

An important step will be for the party to identify thirteen (13) individuals to run, one (1) in each municipality under the banner of the Amalgamation-Yes party.

The party must approve each candidate.  The individuals must be of good character, eligible to run in the relevant municipality, and fully support amalgamation of their municipality with one or more of the neighbouring municipalities. 

They must also not “carry baggage”.  Candidates who might win or lose for other reasons could be a problem.  We need good people who can carry the message as cleanly as possible.  The closer we can get to this the stronger the resulting message to the Provincial Government once they win.

Each candidate must be competent to fully perform the services of a municipal councillor.  They need to be prepared to answer and deal appropriately with all municipal issues.  During the election they will need to be able to answer questions in a way that makes it clear that they would help govern the municipality in a prudent and reasonable way.  When elected they will have to do the job they are elected to for the current municipality, even though they support amalgamation.  Because amalgamation will not occur immediately (if at all) the individuals must be and seem to be, otherwise good candidates to be elected to government.

It is important that there be only one (1) candidate in each municipality as a member of the Amalgamation-Yes party.  This will ensure that the vote is not split.  The objective here is not simply to get as many people as possible in favour of amalgamation elected to council but rather to create our own referendum.

Candidates, once they are identified and approved must be educated as to the other issues in their municipality.  Successful candidates will still have to act as of members of the municipal council and deal with all issues that councils are required to address.  We do not want supporters of amalgamation to vote against the candidate for fear that they will not be able to do a reasonably good job on all other issues in the municipalities.  With that being said, it would also be very clear that in each municipality there would be sufficient council members to help carry the load of governance.  Hence, the reason as well, that Amalgamation-Yes candidates will not run for the position of Mayor.

The messaging from all candidates must be the same.  This creates a regional referendum and because our municipalities are so close there will be cross knowledge and advertising which needs to be consistent. 

Party Structure

The party will require a President, Treasurer, Secretary, Marketing Chair, numerous Researchers, individual candidates, and perhaps others. 

The party website would be set up with sufficient information as to the benefits of amalgamation that each of the candidates and the general public can access.  There is currently the website which we can use for information and linking.

Subject to municipal and provincial requirements, which need to be determined, all candidates would fundraise together, such that funds would be pooled for advertising by the party, which will be the priority rather than as individuals.

Individual candidates will need to attend as many meetings as possible in their municipalities to get the message out. 

Signage is going to be important and the signage must be all the same in each municipality, in fact, it need not even include the candidate’s name, rather “Amalgamation-Yes – If you support this issue - Vote for the Candidate in your Municipality”.

We need to have good researchers to identify all the benefits of amalgamation. 

We also need to address the negatives of amalgamation.

We must develop answers to as many typical questions to municipal candidates as possible, incorporating how the issue could be addressed better if amalgamation were in place. 

The key of course, is that amalgamation will provide for good government.  We eliminate the CRD, we can act as one for the common good of all and we realise numerous benefits from actually being the City we are.  We cannot simply suggest that there may be a cost savings.  The possibility is that there may be an expense.  Taxes might rise (hopefully not).  We need to address this issue. The overall benefits will far exceed any increased cost. 

The cost of party membership should be nominal, if anything, to get our numbers up with an encouragement for individuals to donate more money.

The Plan

The party and candidates should be identified in the near future, prior to the Provincial election on May, 14 2013.  We should bring this issue to the forefront for provincial candidates so that they acknowledge that if there are positive results of such a campaign, then the Government will seriously review the issue of amalgamation.

The initial steps are:

1.     To call the first meeting of the Amalgamation-Yes party. 
2.          Identify the party executive who will commit to moving the issue forward through the next municipal election.
3.          Create a process to approve appropriate candidates as well as how to remove inappropriate candidates.
4.     Start identifying thirteen qualified candidates for the next municipal election.
5.          Ask each municipality again, if they will hold a referendum on the issue of amalgamation.  If any do, then we need not run a candidate in that city
6.     Reach out to all other pro-amalgamation groups to join the party.
7.     Start fundraising.
8.          Start posting all relevant issues and responses regarding the issues of amalgamation. 
9.          Ensure that each candidate obtains sufficient members within their municipality for the party to be listed on the ballot. 
10.      Develop a comprehensive marketing plan including social media, traditional media, signage, and community contacts. 
11. Develop a logo and website.
12. Address all negative comments quickly, competently, and accurately. 
13.      Acknowledge that contrary views are certainly possible and simply point out in a positive way why those views as expressed from time to time are in error.
14.      After the election:  we meet with the Provincial Government, taking to them the results and asking them to act on the mandate.  Also each elected party member will seek to bring forward motions for their municipal governments to seek amalgamation with one of more of their neighbouring municipalities.

Suggested Timeframe

1.     Initial Party meeting October 19, 2012.
2.     Appointment of executive November 15, 2012.
3.     Identify as many municipal candidates by January 31, 2013 (noting this will give us time as well to replace anyone who is unsuitable).
4.          Ensure that a brochure is drafted early on with copies to all current members of government and, all candidates for provincial government, and all members of any new legislature in 2013.


Why is the project important?  I think it is imperative to emphasis that the goal is to create good government in the region for the benefit of all.  Simply put, an amalgamated city will be able to better govern in the interests of all the citizens and be able to move forward to provide a better life for all of us. 

I do not emphasis the lessening of red tape and encouraging business growth.  Clearly these will be desired results; however, the emphasis must be on the overall benefits of coordinated government, the strength in numbers, the influence of a cohesive voice to others, the mandate to move forward on issues that reflect the greater good of the region.

Amalgamation is not being pursued for business.  However the citizens of Greater Victoria and the businesses that support the community will all benefit.  By having a single city (or at least fewer), those who need affordable housing will have a better chance at getting it.  Crime can be dealt with in a far more cohesive way.  Parks can be identified and developed that benefit everyone and logically located to provide equal opportunities.  Community facilities can be located by considering the use everyone will make of them rather than on which municipality wants to pay more.  Tax benefits from the Provincial and federal governments can be obtained and benefit the region.

If you are retired, a single parent, government employee, or a business owner, your life in Greater Victoria will be improved through the existence of a municipal government focused on all of us, regardless of what side of the street you live on.

If you are interested in joining the party, please contact

If you are interested in assisting the party in some capacity such as executive, research, fundraising, or as a municipal candidate, please contact James Legh at  Please include a resume to assist in determining how you can best assist the party.

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Arts Funding - We all need it

Only eight of our 13 municipalities contribute to the CRD arts funding. Sooke, Langford, Colwood, Central Saanich and North Saanich do not. Apparently this is because they think their citizens do not use the arts which are focused mainly on the downtown.

What a crock. I have seen people who live in Sooke at many arts events. Remember, many even work in Victoria. Do they seriously think that their residents do not go to concerts or plays? Do none of them enjoy the Symphony?

The real point is that we live here, in Greater Victoria, not just due to the weather and the beauty, but due to all the benefits the region provides. Were Langford located 100 miles away from the rest of us, I assure you it would not be anything like it is now. It would be Youbou (maybe Port Renfrew).

Good government would flow from amalgamation and such a government could consider what the arts bring to the region, not just to the back pocket of one small area. We should all contribute and we should all benefit, which we will through having a better place to live.

Sunday, September 25, 2011

Victoria looks to Saanich for help meeting carbon-neutral deadline

Victoria needs Saanich to help with meeting a carbon-neutral deadline.

Mayor Fortin is quoted as saying “Why wouldn’t we be doing what Saanich does?

This says it all.

Mayors want a review of Transit

We have poor communication between BC Transit management and the Victoria Regional Transit Commission.

One suggestion by Mayor Leonard is to put the control of transit in the hands of the CRD.

There are concerns that BC Transit is spending money locally on land without local input and spending money on expensive reports for Greater Victoria.

I would suggest that an amalgamated city would simply take over and provide its own Transit system, just like Winnipeg Transit, and then there would be no communication issues and any spending would be directly controlled and be the responsibility of the people we elect to counsel.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

We need a Police Department for All

The Times Colonist editorial of September 20, 2011 says that the correct decision for the provincial government to make is to require Esquimalt to continue a contract for Policing with the City of Victoria and not allow them to switch to the RCMP.

Brilliant, but really, does the province not see that the mere fact they have to look at this issue is reflective of a fundamental flaw in the governance of our Capital?

What the Province should do is say thank you to Esquimalt. This issue is reflective of what will be an ongoing problem, as it will certainly arise again. No matter the answer, Esquimalt may one day say we would like to go with Saanich, or back to Victoria, or whatever.

There should be no choice beyond improving their own, regional police force.

How is it that we have a regional water system and not a regional police force?

We all have the same concerns over water and safety. No area can say they have a different level of overall concern for policing than any other area.

We all want safe drinking water, delivered to us at a reasonable price.

If that water is maliciously tainted, we all want the perpetrators brought to justice and punished in a coordinated and effective manner. Right now we would have to sort out first where the water was tainted, then where the people who did it lived, and then perhaps where the water went. Sounds like another joint committee of policing.

I really do not want to entrust the safety of my family to a committee, which reports to 13 different governments, and has no clear leadership.

Of all the issues that municipal governments deal with, policing is one of the most important. For policing to be effective, good leadership is critical. I will assume this based on the fact that for a few thousand years now human society has clearly implemented a leadership based police/military structure, which while not always perfect, seems to get the job done.

So why are we denied the benefits of a cohesive group of men and women, sworn to protect us no matter where we are in the community?

The province should make a decision and that must be to at least unify the core police departments.

For the record, I live in Saanich; have an office in Victoria, another in Langford and a business in Esquimalt. Some days I am in all four locations. They are all serviced by the same alarm company. They use to be “protected” by 4, now 3 different police departments. If the alarm company can deal with the whole area why can’t the police?

Highway 17 Joint Planning Committee

There is a committee with representatives from at least the Town of Sidney, Central Saanich and North Saanich. (There may be more, I am not sure) This committee makes recommendations to the Ministry of Transportation on issues of safety a safe way to cross Highway 17.

Their priority is a pedestrian overpass at Beacon Avenue. They have been working on this since 2009.

It’s good that they are working together. I also appreciate that the Province is always going to be involved when it comes to a highway.

But you have to think that a capital city, would look at its road safety issues, prioritize them for the sake of all its citizens and then implement the measures needed.

We would not have to strike committees from 3 different cities who then try to lobby the provincial government.

The Highway 17 Joint Planning Committee only exists because we have so many cities. A properly constituted municipal government would just deal with these issues in the best interests of all its citizens.

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Victoria Police will be Marketing for a Regional Force

Victoria Police are pushing for a Regional Force. I am happy that the Victoria Police plan to market the problems that result from a lack of a regional force; I just worry that it will be perceived as self serving. The truth of what they say is clear. We would all be safer and better protected with a regional police force. The problem is that not everyone, politicians in particular, believe it. Those who can speak out will and they will simply say the source is biased.

It would be so very nice if any other police force would do this instead.